Obama regime’s indifference to jihad

Muslims everywhere in their Christian or post-Christian host societies go berserk and slay dozens or hundreds in deliberate massacres. This is an observed fact. Then they say, if they survive, that Islam made them do it, and justify their murders on the basis of Islam.

Imagine if Germans or whiter people woke up from their peaceful lives, donned “assault uniforms”, armed themselves, carried out massacres, shouted Heil Hitler and died with swastikas on their arms. And this scene was repeated across the world by all sorts of converts to National Socialism from races and ethnicities from the Philippines to Tangier to San Francisco, from Murmansk to Cape Town.

In the following news article,  I want you mentally to replace every mention of the word Muslim with National-Socialist, and every mention of Islam with National Socialism.

The US Attorney General, the chief law enforcement agent of the federal government, speaking to a Muslim Advocates dinner, the day after the latest mass murder in San Bernardino, said the following:

Speaking to the audience at the Muslim Advocates[National Socialist Advocates’] 10th anniversary dinner Thursday, Lynch said her “greatest fear” is the “incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim [anti National Socialist] rhetoric” in America and vowed to prosecute any guilty of what she deemed violence-inspiring speech.

“The fear that you have just mentioned is in fact my greatest fear as a prosecutor, as someone who is sworn to the protection of all of the American people, which is that the rhetoric will be accompanied by acts of violence,” she said.

“Now obviously this is a country that is based on free speech, but when it edges towards violence, when we see the potential for someone lifting that mantle of anti-Muslim [anti National-Socialist] rhetoric—or, as we saw after 9/11, violence directed at individuals who may not even be Muslims [National-Socialists]  but perceived to be Muslims[National-Socialists] , and they will suffer just as much—when we see that we will take action,” said Lynch.

After touting the numbers of “investigations into acts of anti-Muslim [National-Socialist] hatred” and “bigoted actions” against Muslims [National-Socialists]launched by her DOJ, Lynch suggested the Constitution does not protect “actions predicated on violent talk” and pledged to prosecute those responsible for such actions.

“I think it’s important that as we again talk about the importance of free speech we make it clear that actions predicated on violent talk are not America,” said Lynch. “They are not who we are, they are not what we do, and they will be prosecuted.”

There are times when the distance between the Obama regime and the sentiments and interests of the American people is so vast that I am tempted to believe that Obama represents  a gigantic leftist conspiracy to destroy America and the decent people who make it work. The rest of the time I think he is just a leftist academic know-better asshole.


So, is this equation correct: National Socialists = Muslims?

Or is it just jihadists=national socialists, and if the latter is true, how are we to tell the difference, as a Muslim can can slip into his jihadist self after a bad argument at work, or seemingly, a spilled cup of coffee.

Certainly this equation is true:

Violent racial supremacists= violent religious supremacists

The ideology may differ in causal justifications, but not in outcomes.