It must be Nurse Ratched’s day off at the Cuckoo’s Nest; poor little Cathy McCrackpot didn’t get her meds. Canada’s “Environment“ Minister, Catherine McKenna, called on her drones to consider “the gendered impacts of climate change on women, girls and children.” (here) All kinds of “women negotiators” are being trained up to deal with the problem of manmade (person-made?) climate change.
That’ll help. Of course, person-made climate change affects us all equally, but that doesn’t stop unscrupulous politicians inventing fantasies to feather their particular little nests.
The one thing about the world around us, aka objective reality, is that it is the same for everyone regardless of who they are. The laws of physics are the same for everyone because the basic precept of the scientific worldview is that there is an objective reality. Sir Isaac Newton discovered the fundamental Law of Gravitation. That law would be the same if he had been a woman, something that appears to be possible in the Liberal alternative universe.
McCrackpot’s hint that “women negotiators” would somehow be better than men implies an essential difference between women and men that is innate, that is, rooted in the woman-ness. Of course, women are different from men, but liberals, not noted for their consistency, will claim that men can change into women if they feel like it. So what difference would “women negotiators” have that men wouldn’t have?
None. It’s all about jobs for the chicks. Cushy government jobs with loadsamoney and no responsibilities. As one wit noted, the minister’s own job is fruit of “gender-appointed roles to made-up superfluous positions.”
After all, who is going to be held to account if the “climate” doesn’t do what they want?
As the saying goes: “World Ends Tomorrow. Women and Children Affected Most.”